Tag Archives: Supreme Court

Looks Like Whoopi Goldberg Put On Her “Thinking Cap” Again

Posted on June 28, 2018 by forloveofgodandcountry

by Diane Rufino, June 28, 2018 On this morning’s airing of “The View” (the show with cackling, often deranged, liberal women), Whoopi Goldberg addressed Supreme Court Anthony Kennedy’s resignation and her concerns over President Trump’s chance to pick a replacement … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged abortion, abortion right, Diane Rufino, Get out of my vagina, Justice Anthony Kennedy, Justice Kennedy, Justice Kennedy's replacement, pussy hats, Supreme Court, supreme court nominee, The View, Trump, vagina caps, vagina hats, Whoopi Goldberg, Whoopi Goldberg's rant, Whoopi's rant, Women's March | Leave a comment

The Supreme Court Upholds Trump’s Travel Ban!

Posted on June 26, 2018 by forloveofgodandcountry

by Diane Rufino, June 26, 2018 Today, the Supreme Court handed down its “opinion” in the case challenging Trump’s Travel Ban (Trump v. Hawaii), and it rejected the decision of the uber liberal 9th Circuit Court of Appeals which struck … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged Diane Rufino, Muslim travel ban, Supreme Court, travel ban, Trump, Trump v. Hawaii, Trump's travel ban | Leave a comment

OBERGEFELL v. HODGES: An Example of the Very Real Tendency of the Federal Courts to Render Unconstitutional Opinions

Posted on March 28, 2018 by forloveofgodandcountry

Photo credit: Photo is from FreakingNews.com) by Diane Rufino, March 26, 2018 We are all used to the accusations that a certain Executive Action is unconstitutional or a federal law is unconstitutional, and we are used to challenges to them … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged Diane Rufino, federal courts, federal judiciary, gay marriage opinion, judicial activism, liberal justices, Obergefell, Obergefell dissent, Obergefell v. Hodges, progressive judges, progressive justices, progressives judges, Supreme Court, Thomas Jefferson, unconstitutional, unconstitutional court decisions, unconstitutional court opinions, unconstitutional judicial opinions | Leave a comment

OBERGEFELL v. HODGES: The Scathing Dissent by Chief Justice John Roberts Explains Why the Majority Opinion Was an Abuse of Judicial Power under the US Constitution

Posted on March 23, 2018 by forloveofgodandcountry

by Diane Rufino, March 16, 2018 “If you are among the many Americans—of whatever sexual orientation—who favor expanding same-sex marriage, by all means celebrate today’s decision. Celebrate the achievement of a desired goal. Celebrate the opportunity for a new expression … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged activist court, Article III, Chief Justice John Marshall, Chief Justice John Roberts, conservative judges, Constitution, Diane Rufino, federal judiciary, gay marriage, John Marshall, judical tyranny, judicial activism, judicial overreach, judicial review, Justice Alito, Justice Scalia, Justice Thomas, liberal judges, living breathing document, Marbury v. Madison, McCulloch v Maryland, Obergefell, Obergefell decision, Obergefell dissent, Obergefell v. Hodges, originalism, progressive judges, strict construction, Supreme Court, Thomas Jefferson, unconstitutional, unconstitutional decisions, unconstitutional opinions, unconstitutional supreme court decisions | 6 Comments

Phillips v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission: Will the Supreme Court Leave the First Amendment Intact?

Posted on March 10, 2018 by forloveofgodandcountry

Photo: Take by Diane Rufino on December 5, 2017, of Jack Phillips and his attorney, Kristin Waggoner, outside the Supreme Court building after Oral Arguments. by Diane Rufino, March 9, 2018 We’ve all heard of the case of the … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged ADF, Alliance Defending Freedom, cake artist, Christian baker, Colonel Noel Francisco, Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act, compelled speech, compelled speech doctrine, custom wedding cakes, David Cole, deeply-held religious beliefs, Diane Rufino, discrimination, expression, expressive speech, first amendment, Frederick Yarger, Free Exercise, free expression, free speech, freedom of expression, freedom of religion, gay marriage, gay rights, Jack Phillips, Justice Kennedy, Kristin Waggoner, Masterpiece Cakeshop, Obergefell, Obergefell v. Hodges, oral arguments, Phillips v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission, religious liberty, Ryan T. Anderson, same-sex marriage, Supreme Court, traditional marriage, wedding cakes | 1 Comment

INTERPOSITION: The Duty to Say “NO!”

Posted on January 26, 2018 by forloveofgodandcountry

by Diane Rufino, January 25, 2018 The word Interposition means “to place between; cause to intervene.” In the context of the Constitution and the system of government it has established in this country, interposition is the doctrine that says that … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged 10th Amendment, Diane Rufino, dual sovereignty, English barons, federal courts, federal judiciary, federal monopoly, Federalism, government overreach, government tyranny, human rights, interposition, just say no, King John, Magna Carta, Marbury v. Madison, nullification, roots of liberty, Runnymede, Supreme Court, Tenth Amendment, the great charter, tyranny, unconstitutional, usurpation | Leave a comment

JUDICIAL ACTIVISM: The Obstruction of Construction

Posted on September 22, 2017 by forloveofgodandcountry

by Diane Rufino, September 21, 2017 In Honor of the 230th Anniversary of the US Constitution, and also to help promote Brion McClanahan’s latest book, HOW ALEXANDER HAMILTON SCREWED UP AMERICA, I wanted to post this important History Lesson — … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged Alexander Hamilton, article 1 section 8, Article I, Bank Bill, Brion McClanahan, Chief Justice John Marshall, Constitution, constitutional construction, Diane Rufino, express powers, George Washington, government of limited powers, How Alexander Hamilton Screwed Up America, implied powers, Jefferson v Hamilton, judicial activism, judicial tyranny, Kevin Gutzman, limited government, loose construction, McCulloch v Maryland, national bank, national government, national v federal, necessary and proper clause, strict construction, Supreme Court, Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson - Revolutionary | Leave a comment

	Jeffrey Liakos on Why We Need a Constitutional A…
	Jeffrey Liakos on Thanks Ronald Reagan for the S…
	Jeffrey Liakos on Ignoring the Facts, Americans…
	The Tactical Hermit on The War of 1861: Education is…
	The Tactical Hermit on The War of 1861: Education is…

Tag Archives: Supreme Court

Looks Like Whoopi Goldberg Put On Her “Thinking Cap” Again

The Supreme Court Upholds Trump’s Travel Ban!

OBERGEFELL v. HODGES: An Example of the Very Real Tendency of the Federal Courts to Render Unconstitutional Opinions

OBERGEFELL v. HODGES: The Scathing Dissent by Chief Justice John Roberts Explains Why the Majority Opinion Was an Abuse of Judicial Power under the US Constitution

Phillips v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission: Will the Supreme Court Leave the First Amendment Intact?

INTERPOSITION: The Duty to Say “NO!”

JUDICIAL ACTIVISM: The Obstruction of Construction

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Categories

Meta