Why a Marriage Amendment?

 

 

 

by Diane Rufino

 

My state of North Carolina is the latest state to face a possible erosion of traditional marriage. The question will be: How will its people react?  Marriage is a solid bedrock foundation of communities – the source of modeling, morality, and values. The lessons children learn go far beyond the mere words that parents speak.

Redefining marriage as a genderless institution has consequences. First, public schools will be legally required to teach same-sex marriage on an equal footing with traditional marriage. It will therefore take away the most fundamental right that parents have – to raise their children according to values they hold dear and according to their rights of religious conscience.  James Madison said: “Conscience is the most sacred of all property  – our greatest possession.”

Look at the situation in the schools in Massachusetts, where same-sex marriage has been legal since 2004.  One can find the book “King & King” by Linda de Haan and Stern Nijland in their elementary school libraries. The book tells the story of a queen who decided it was time for her son, the prince, to marry. He rejects every princess she offers. Finally the last candidate enters, and the prince feels “a stir in his heart.” But it was for one princess’s brother, Prince Lee.  The two men marry and the book reads: “Everyone lives happily ever after.” On the last page, the two princes kiss, with a red heart covering their mouths.

The book glorifies the idea that it’s perfectly OK to have same-sex marriage.

A grade school boy in California returned home from school and asked his mother: “Mom, am I gay?”  She wanted to know why he would ask such a question.  He told her that his teacher told the class that “anyone can be gay.”  Children shouldn’t be confronted with such questions. They shouldn’t have to entertain such possibilities or have to deal with such unnecessary confusion.  Growing up is hard enough.

Parents have a tough enough time raising their children with proper values and morals and they can’t keep fighting with a school system that wants social change rather than social stability. Providing a definition to the institution of marriage in NC would help ensure that teachers assign classic reading and not books like “King & King.”

Advertisements

About forloveofgodandcountry

I'm originally from New Jersey where I spent most of my life. I now live in North Carolina with my husband and 4 children. I'm an attorney
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Why a Marriage Amendment?

  1. M says:

    “his teacher told the class that “anyone can be gay.” Children shouldn’t be confronted with such questions.”

    So very much so. So now, my ultimate question is why the refusal to open the findings to determine which party stands in the demented light, since that is what we are all being accused of, the contention over the soundness of civil minds? Do the findings for those whom have been exposed reveal a deterioration in the unintended sphere, health, social contentment, aptitudes and in any other long-term findings?

    Also, using the Author of nature as a guide, which conviction is most likely to press to resolve, debate the impact inwardly from the highest seat. Yes, if “judgment must first” come from the house of God, our shaking out this wrinkle should also remind us to reinvigorate dialog with the offending models of Christ bearing leaders. For starters, to regain strength of the bear minimum, begin to popularize the unfavorable train of true converts from such a life. As it could be here.

  2. paintstation says:

    “[H]is teacher told the class that “anyone can be gay.” Children shouldn’t be confronted with such questions.”

    So very much so. So now, my ultimate question is why the refusal to open the findings to determine which party stands in the demented light, since that is what we are all being accused of, the contention over the soundness of civil minds? Do the findings for those whom have been exposed reveal a deterioration in the unintended sphere, health, social contentment, aptitudes and in any other long-term findings?

    Also, using the Author of nature as a guide, which conviction is most likely to press to resolve, debate the impact inwardly from the highest seat. Yes, if “judgment must first” come from the house of God, our shaking out this wrinkle should also remind us to reinvigorate dialog with the offending models of Christ bearing leaders. For starters, to regain strength of the bear minimum, begin to popularize the unfavorable train of true converts from such a life. As it could be here.

    God Bless!

    Michael S.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s