US History 101: Our Founding History

AMERICA’S FOUNDING HISTORY
by Diane Rufino

America’s founding history can be prefaced with this quote by Calvin Coolidge, our 30th President: “To live under the American Constitution is the greatest political privilege that was ever accorded to the human race.”  Our founding history is one that ultimately produced the most perfect national Constitution in the world and the template most friendly to human liberty.

Our history is defined first by those brave men and women who braved rough seas and a hostile new continent to start colonies where they could worship freely without prejudice or oppression. These early settlers came mainly from England where subjects were forced to respect the state church.  For our benefit, they established colonies on English law and established the notion of religious freedom.  While memory has faded and we tend to forget the sacrifice these men and women made to settle this country, including the ravages of disease, famine, and hostile Indians, we feel more of a connection to our Founding Fathers because even today, we feel the impact very much of their contributions.

Everything we enjoy today in this country is a gift from our Founders.  And if we would have listened more closely to their warnings and admonitions, we would be enjoying even more freedom today, especially with respect to religion, property and opportunities in the marketplace.  Although it is discouraged in the public school system, how often do young people, and even their parents, take a moment and reflect and Thank God that out of all the miserable places in the world, they were blessed to be born in the United States?

First, let’s meet our Founding Fathers.

I.  OUR FOUNDING FATHERS

What does it mean to be a “Founding Father” of the United States?  The distinction includes many great, courageous, and wisely forward-thinking men.  They include:

(i)  Those men who framed, wrote, and signed our Declaration of Independence in 1776
(ii)  Those men who framed, wrote, and signed our US Constitution in 1787
(iii) Those men who worked tirelessly to promote the Constitution’s virtues and to help secure its ratification and adoption with the states
(iv) Those men who, whether as writers or politicians or jurists or statesmen or soldiers or
diplomats or even ordinary citizens, helped initiate the cause for our independence and helped secure our victory in the Revolutionary War.

Many of these men pledged their “lives, property, and sacred honor” and put their lives on the line as “traitors” to the Crown so we could have our independence.

The brilliance of our Founders is second only to the bravery and determination they showed, and they deserve our respect and gratitude.  Theirs is a debt that at the very least we can repay by being educated on their contributions and on our founding history.

James Madison - from Virginia.  Madison was invaluable in the creation of the Constitution, even though most of his ideas were rejected at the Convention, as we’ll learn later.  He is called the “Father of the Constitution” because he is its primary author.  Madison made many important contributions:

(1)  He initiated the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia in 1787 and convinced George Washington to preside over it.  (Without Washington, it was very likely that the other states would not have taken the Convention seriously and would not have sent delegates).

(2)  He drafted an outline of what kind of government the new nation should have (over-coming the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation).  In fact, he drafted a whole new plan from scratch (called the Virginia Plan)

(3)  He recorded in great detail the debates and deliberations of the 4-month-long Constitutional Convention (see Madison’s “Notes of Debates of the Federal Convention of 1787″)

(4)  Although he originally wanted a strong “national” government at the expense of the individual states, by the time the Constitution was written and signed, he became a strong supporter.  (Perhaps it was because his friend Thomas Jefferson commented that “no finer document had ever been drafted by the minds of men”).   In fact, when it was clear that most of the states were suspicious of the new constitution and probably wouldn’t ratify it, he joined with Alexander Hamilton and John Jay to write a series of essays – called The
Federalist Papers
– to explain in detail how limited the federal government would be and how it would be restrained, and to reassure the states that they would retain their sovereign power.  The Federalist Papers were essential in convincing the states to ratify the Constitution.

(5)  Finally, James Madison became convinced, after Jefferson pressured him, that a Bill of Rights was necessary.  He drafted them – modeling them closely after Virginia’s Bill of Rights (called the “Declaration of Rights”), which were written by George Mason.

Thomas Jefferson – from Virginia   It is most likely that Thomas Jefferson, of all the other Founders, whose intellect and vision contributed most to our founding documents.

(1)  He was the author of the Declaration of Independence.

(2)  Even before the Declaration, he wrote A Summary View of the Rights of British America in 1774, which laid out a set of grievances against the King for delegates to the First Continental Congress. He wanted it sent to  King George III, on behalf of the Congress, to appeal to him to intercede on behalf of the colonies and to treat them with the same respect shown other English subjects.

(3)  Although he was not present at the Constitutional Convention (he was ambassador to France at time), he had strong opinions as to how a “federal” government should be
structured and he was able to influence the deliberations at the Convention through a steady stream of correspondence.

(4)  He was thrilled with the final product that the delegates drafted, except he felt that it needed a Bill of Rights.  He helped push the Constitution through the state ratifying convention by writing extensively on its interpretation and necessity. While he did not contribute to the Federalist Papers, he commented that they were “the best commentary on the principles of government, which ever was written.”

(5)  His influence was most felt in the drafting of the Bill of Rights.  Madison never saw
the need for a Bill of Rights, but Jefferson did – even at the time of the Constitutional
Convention. And by 1788, he finally convinced Madison of the need for it.  As I said earlier, George Mason wrote Virginia’s Bill of Rights on which our Bill of Rights was fashioned.  But Mason himself fashioned Virginia’s Bill of Rights after Jefferson’s own Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom.

(6)  Jefferson is considered the father of Religious freedom (and today, he is especially known as the strongest proponent of “separation of church and state”)

(7)  Before his death, he left explicit instructions about what he wanted written on his tombstone.  He wanted the following inscription, and not a word more:  “Here was buried Thomas Jefferson – Author of the Declaration of American Independence and of the Statute of Virginia for Religious Freedom, and Father of the University of Virginia.”  The reason, he wrote, was because “by these, I have lived and I wish most to be remembered.”

(8)  Sadly, Jefferson died financially destitute, but paid off many of his debts by selling his book collection to Congress for $25,000 (about half million dollars in 2010).  His books were used to begin the Library of Congress.

TRIVIA:  Both Thomas Jefferson and John Adams died on the same day – July 4, 1826, the 50th anniversary of the ratification of the Declaration of Independence.

George Washington – From Virginia  –  Aptly described as:  “First in war — First in peace — First in the hearts of his countrymen.”

(1)  He was the ultimate selfless patriot and public servant

(2)  He was a member of the Continental Congress (1774-75)

(3)  Washington was the Commander of the Continental Army which defeated the British forces in the Revolutionary War.

(4)  When asked to preside over the Continental Congress as its president, he willingly accepted, even though he was suffering from debilitating rheumatoid arthritis.  He understood firsthand how important it was to address the limitations of the Articles of Confederation because as Commander of the army, he had to plead and beg the Continental Congress for years to provide food and supplies for his men and to pay them.  (it’s a miracle most of the men continued to fight without that support).

(5)  When the time came to select a President of the new United States, his countrymen called on him again, with a unanimous voice.  It was fitting that he would be our First president.

(6)  In public life, he defended religion and morality as what he called the “twin pillars” of a free society.

TRIVIA:  Washington was the only president elected by unanimous vote of the electoral college.

Gouverneur Morris – From Pennsylvania  – Morris was a master draftsman who was appointed to the Committee on Style to draft the final version of the Constitution.  He is
especially credited for writing the Preamble, which he drafted almost as an after-thought.  He wanted to include a statement setting forth the reasons for the Constitution.

John Adams – From Massachusetts –  Adams was a lawyer and a brilliant writer and thinker.

(1).  Early on, he was a very vocal advocate for separation from England.  In 1776,
through the Continental Congress, he began urging that the colonies to adopt their own constitutions, which was a precursor to becoming independent states. As Adams said: “The resolution to draft independent constitutions is, in and of itself, an act of independence.”

(2)  He was appointed to the Committee to write the Declaration of Independence and it was assumed, with his skills, that he would write it, but he convinced Jefferson to write it instead (telling him that he was a far better writer than he).

(3)  Although he was abroad at the time of the Constitutional Convention (as ambassador to Great Britain), he wrote a pamphlet called “Thoughts on Government,” which was very influential to the framing of the Constitution and the design of the government.  It advocated for a government of limited powers and one based on a clear separation of powers.

Samuel Adams – Governor of Massachusetts and cousin of John Adams.  Sam Adams is called “The Father of the American Revolution.”

(1)  He headed the Sons of Liberty and was the principal planner of the Boston Tea Party.
(The “Sons of Liberty” were a group of political agitators who formed in opposition to the Stamp Act and to Britain’s taxation of the colonists without representation in Parliament.
Groups existed in every colony. The reason they formed was to force those who distributed the stamps and collected the tax to resign.  It was a form of protest against England).

(2)  In April 1775, British soldiers were ordered to Lexington to capture rebel leaders, Sam Adams and John Hancock. It was Paul Revere who warned them, by lanterns in the Old North Church tower  – “One if by land, Two if by sea.”

(3)  Many of Massachusetts’ revolutionary documents, including the famous “Massachusetts Resolves” – which encouraged colonists to protest over Taxation without Representation –  were written by Sam Adams.

(4)  Although he lacked oratory skills, he is considered one of the most influential political writers of his time.

(5)  Sam Adams is principally responsible for the creation of a Constitutional Congress.

Benjamin Franklin – From Pennsylvania  – Franklin possessed more than just an ordinary genius.

(1)  It was Franklin who first proposed, in 1754, that the colonies collaborate for mutual benefit. (This collaboration would be the precursor to the Articles of Confederation which was drafted in 1776-77).  The “Join or Die” flag (the severed snake) was designed by Franklin to show the signify the importance of the states joining together.

(2)  He was this nation’s first minister to France and helped forge a crucial alliance with that country which helped us win the Revolutionary War.  Washington could never have defeated Cornwallis at Yorktown without the naval blockade provided by the French and the troops it sent.

(3)  At the age of 81, Franklin was the senior statesman of the Constitutional Convention.
Because of his age, experience, diplomacy skills, humor, and out-going personality, his particular role was that of diplomat.

(4)  He was also was one of the architects of the compromise between large states and small states on how states would be represented in Congress and how the final government should be structured.

Alexander Hamilton – From New York  – One of the most vocal and active debaters at the Constitutional Convention. 

(1)  Unfortunately, his view was the least tolerated.  He urged a national government based on the British model – a strong, centralized Parliament and a King (he called it a Governor) who would be selected, not elected, for life.  He wanted to strip the states of their power.

(2)  Hamilton ended up contributing very little to the final product.

(3)  However, in the struggle for ratification by the states, Hamilton became a champion of the new Constitution. Like Madison, who also didn’t get his way, Hamilton became a staunch supporter of the Constitution when it seemed likely that the states wouldn’t ratify. He went on to write the Federalist Papers with Madison and John Jay and played a pivotal role in helping to sell the Constitution to the states and getting it ratified.

(4)  He died in 1804 at the age of 49 in a duel with Aaron Burr (Jefferson’s vice president)

(5)  Unfortunately, as important as Hamilton was in getting the states to ratify the Constitution, he is remembered as the founder responsible for the government’s broad power to tax and spend.  As Washington’s Secretary of the Treasury, he enunciated the clearest argument ever made for a liberal construction of the Constitution, which the progressive Supreme Court at the time quickly picked up on.  [US v. Butler (1936)].


James Mason – From Virginia -

(1)  Mason wrote the Virginia Declaration of Rights (1776), which provided the template (and in good part, even the very language) for our US Bill of Rights.

(2)  He fought hard to abolish slavery with the adoption of the Constitution. In fact he refused to sign the Constitution because it did not outright abolish the slave trade. The compromise, embodied in Article I, Section 9, clause 1 was not good enough for him.  (Article 1, Section 9, clause 1:  Congress was forbidden to abolish the slave trade in the US until 1808.  It was primarily Georgia and South Carolina which negotiated this compromise. They wanted at least 20 years to transition from slavery).

As he wrote: “Every master of slaves is a petty tyrant and they will bring the judgment of Heaven on a country… As Nations cannot be rewarded or punished in the next world, they must in this.  By an inevitable chain of causes and effects, Providence punishes national sins by national calamities.”

John Jay – From New York  – Jay was a respected lawyer.

(1)  He served as one of the early Presidents of the Continental Congress (in 1779).

(2)  His greatest contribution was in joining with Madison and Hamilton to write the Federalist Papers.

(3)  Jay went on to become our nation’s first Supreme Court Chief Justice – appointed by President Washington.

Thomas Paine – Born in England, Paine settled in Philadelphia and became a journalist.

(1)  He is one of the greatest political thinkers of all time.

(2)  He was a huge proponent of Natural Law (which we’ll discuss later)

(3)  He wrote Common Sense and the Rights of ManCommon Sense, which was written before the Declaration of Independence, challenged British rule and called for a separation from England.  It was such a powerful document that the Revolution became inevitable. In fact, General Washington read it to his men while they were encamped during the war.
Its discussion of liberty inspired all of our national founding documents.  (4)  It is probable that we would never have had the Revolution if it weren’t for Tom Paine’s writings.

Patrick Henry – From Virginia  –  Patrick Henry was a fiery orator.  We all know his famous speech to the Virginia legislature:  Calling for independence from England, he said: ” Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery?  I know not course others may take, but for me, Give Me Liberty or Give Me Death!”

(1)  He was a member of the Sons of Liberty and pushed for independence from England.

(2)  Madison asked Henry to attend the Constitutional Convention as a delegate, but he turned down the invitation, claiming: “I smell a rat.”  (He was probably referring to Hamilton, or even Madison himself).  He suspected that the Convention would do more than simply amend the Articles of Convention and instead, completely overhaul the federal government. He feared they would try to make it more powerful, thereby erodin individual liberty and destroying the sovereignty of the states.

(3)  Ultimately, however, Henry became one of the most vocal proponents of a Bill of Rights. He argued that if the states were going to adopt the new Constitution, it at least ought to be guarded by a Bill of Rights.

One of the best quotes from any Founder comes from Patrick Henry:  “The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people;  It is an instrument for the people to restrain the government – lest it comes to dominate our lives and interests.”

John Hancock – From Massachusetts.  Like Sam Adams, John Hancock helped initiate
the cause for our independence and initiate the war itself.

(1)  Hancock was a 2-term president of the Continental Congress and in fact, he was serving as president when the Declaration of Independence was adopted.  Because of his position, it was his official duty to sign the document first.  We all can picture John Hancock’s large and fanciful signature.  It is said that once he affixed his signature, he exclaimed: “There, I guess King George can see that!”

(2)  Hancock was a member of the Sons of Liberty and with Sam Adams, helped organize the Boston Tea Party.  Like Adams, he was a rebel-rouser and was very active in protesting against England’s treatment of the colonies.  British soldiers were ordered to arrest him,
along with Adams, in 1775 – and this event would ultimately lead to the beginning of the Revolutionary War.  [British troops were ordered to Concord after colonists had taken
gunpowder from the British and after they learned that the colonists were stockpiling ammunition and were planning a revolution.  Adams and Hancock were suspected. The soldiers planned to raid the weapons depot and then capture Hancock and Sam Adams.  It was Paul Revere and his midnight ride that warned them but ended in the Battle at Lexington where the first shot of the Revolutionary War was fired].

Richard Henry Lee – from Virginia -

(1)  Served as President of the Continental Congress under the Articles of Confederation.

(2)  As we’ll learn later, it was Lee who introduced a formal resolution on June 8, 1776 to the Continental Congress to draft a Declaration of Independence.

(3)  Lee opposed the Constitution of 1787, which in his opinion dangerously concentrated power in the federal government.  He publicly criticized the Constitution through his essays in a Virginia publication under the title “Letters from the Federal Farmer.”  [Those that supported the new Constitution were called "Federalists" and those who opposed it were called "Anti-Federalists."  The "Letters from the Federal Farmer" were part of the Anti-Federalist Papers, which prompted the writing of The Federalist Papers, which are the essays providing a detailed explanation of the Constitution].

(4)  He also felt the Constitution was inadequate because it didn’t protect religion sufficiently and did not require virtue for public officials.  As he said: “There are those of you who laugh at virtue and will frustrate public good.  But you are much fitter to be Slaves in the corrupt, rotten despotisms of Europe than to remain citizens of this young and rising republic.”

(5)  He was the great uncle of General Robert E. Lee.

II.  OUR EARLY ENGLISH HISTORY

In talking about our Founding Principles, it’s important to first understand that to a large degree, our founding documents are based on English law and English tradition.  That’s because English history is OUR history.

The colonists, even though they left England to settle on new shores, they did so based on Charters granted by the mother country.  They considered themselves British subjects. The British mocked them and called them “Americans” which was a derogatory term, but nonetheless, the colonists, and even our Founding Fathers, considered themselves British
subjects.  They came to America’s shores with the same protections of liberty that those in England enjoyed.  In fact, when our founding Englishmen came to the “New World” to establish colonies, they brought with them charters guaranteeing that they and their heirs would “have and enjoy all liberties and immunities of free and natural subjects.”  As our
forefathers developed laws for the colonies, and then drafted Constitutions to announce their independence as sovereign states, they incorporated the liberties guaranteed by the great English documents including the Magna Carta and the English Bill of Rights.

The history of England began with the Anglo-Saxons — Germanic tribes that migrated to the English isle from Germany and southern Scandinavia. They populated and ruled England from about the 5th century to the Norman Conquest in 1066.  In 1066, England’s king Edward died – without any heirs. The Normans invaded England because its king, King William, had a legitimate claim to the throne.  With this invasion, Anglo-Saxon rule was replaced with Norman rule. (Normandy is the northern area of France).  Anglo-Saxons were reduced to peasants in their own country and denied the rights that had once protected them as English subjects.  For over 100 years – that is, until 1215 (with the signing of the Magna Carta) – the people of England tried to get back the laws that had protected them before the Normans took over.

In 1215, the Magna Carta was signed by King John to acknowledge the “rights of all freeman.”  King John was a tyrant king during the Medieval era who abused his power over his subjects – mainly the feudal barons.  The barons rebelled and King John was forced to concede to their demands.  The barons drafted a charter resurrecting historic English rights and they forced King John to sign it. Originally, the charter referred to “the rights of barons,” but was then changed to “the rights of all free men.”   King John fixed his official seal to acknowledge that the charter was the supreme law of the land and from that point on, it became known as the “Magna Carta” or “Great Charter” of liberty.  [Note:  Feudal barons were a low-ranking class of  nobility that received large grants of land in return for a pledge of loyalty to the King - which meant they would provide the King with money (tax revenue) and men for battle].

Besides the actual rights set forth in the Magna Carta, the document was especially significant because it demonstrated that the power of the king could be limited by a written charter.

Other important historic English documents include the Petition of Right, the Habeas Corpus Act and the English Bill of Right.

The Petition of Right  –  was signed by King Charles in 1628.    It is a statement of the civil liberties possessed by English subjects that the King could not violate.  (What
does this sound like?)  The Petition was also most notable for the following: (1) taxes can be levied only by Parliament, (2) that martial law may not be imposed in time of peace, and (3)  that prisoners must be able to challenge the legitimacy of their detentions through a writ of habeas corpus.

The Petition of Right is the reason the colonists became so enraged over “Taxation Without Representation.”   The colonists, who saw themselves as English subjects – believed if taxes were to be levied by Parliament on them, they had a right to have representation there.

We see the Petition of Right in the 3rd Amendment – “No quartering of troops without the consent of the homeowner.”

The Habeas Corpus Act  (1679) –  This was adopted by Parliament in response to a multitude of abuses of detained persons.  The Habeas Corpus Act  would become our Fifth Amendment.

The English Bill of Rights  (1689) – the precursor to our Bill of Rights.  By 1688, England was ruled again by a tyrant –  King James II.  He suspended Parliament and then
disbanded it, taxed at will, ignored the Magna Carta, and in general put himself above all laws.  English nobility talked Holland’s William of Orange into invading England and ousting King James. They promised no resistance.  So William invaded and in a bloodless revolution, ousted the tyrant king.  It was called the “Glorious Revolution.”

Immediately, Parliament became functional again and it drafted a Declaration of Rights.  Before formally offering the throne of England jointly to William and his wife Mary, Parliament demanded that they sign it as part of their oaths –  which they did.

From that moment forward, it altered the balance of power between the King and his subjects. The power of the King would have limits.  Kings and Queens would be subject to laws passed by Parliament, they would respect the rights and liberties of English subjects, they couldn’t suspend laws, and they would respect the fact that Parliament alone has the right to levy taxes (so no arbitrary taxation).

As you can see, with all these documents – from the Magna Carta to the English Bill of Rights – the English were constantly forcing limits on government power. Each document was a restatement of Individual rights as with respect to government.  And this is the history – the history of individual liberty – that our early settlers brought with them to America.  This will help you understand why the colonists sought their independence and what our early Americans expected from their new government.

III.  TIMELINE TO INDEPENDENCE  

The first English settlement in America was established in Jamestown, Virginia, in 1607, although its survival was tenuous because of disease, a swampy location, and hostile
Indians. The first Pilgrims landed on Plymouth Rock, Massachusetts, in 1620 and after a rough first winter, they were able to reap a bountiful harvest and enjoy a successful colony – the Plymouth Bay Colony. (This is why we celebrate Thanksgiving).  In 1630, the Puritans
came to America and settled the Massachusetts Bay Colony.  While onboard their ship their leader John Winthrop delivered a sermon referencing the gospel of St. Matthew and pledging:  ”We shall be as a City upon a hill – the eyes of all people are upon us…”  He was referring to the fact that America would be God’s Country and because of that, it would be an exceptional nation.

For about 140 years after the founding of the Plymouth Bay Colony, England invested little time or energy in the colonies.  It didn’t provide assistance or money to help build the
colonies – only charters for land (in return for trade opportunities).  In fact, from 1650 on, England instituted a series of laws of trade and navigation known as the Navigation Acts. Their purpose was to limit colonial trade to the British only, but they were enforce loosely. Only when the colonies became productive did England take particular notice and begin to impose its policies.  From that point on, the colonies were on a collision course with the British and war was inevitable.

The collision course effectively began when the British defeated the French in 1761 in the French-Indian War to rid the northern colonies of the threat that French settlers posed.
Parliament decided to pass the costs of that war onto the colonists through a series of taxes.  But England did more than just tax the colonists, and it would be this whole sum total that would give them ample grounds to want to separate from England.  They felt England was violating their rights as English subjects.  As Jefferson would later write in the Declaration of Independence:  “The history of the King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an
absolute Tyranny over these States.”

  • For example, Parliament passed The Stamp Act in 1765, which was a direct tax on the colonies (on almost all printed paper products) – payable to England.  This offended the colonies so strongly that the Sons of Liberty formed, headed by Sam Adams, to harass tax collectors and the colonists began to protest “No Taxation Without Representation!”
  • There was the Tea Act, of 1773, which imposed a heavy import tax on tea and allowed the India Tea Company to have a monopoly to supply the colonies.  Approximately 50 members of the Sons of Liberty protested with the Boston Tea Party.
  • Parliament retaliated with the Intolerable Acts of 1774, which: (1) stopped all shipping in Boston Harbor until Massachusetts paid the taxes owed on the tea dumped in the harbor and also reimbursed the East India Company for the loss of the tea; and (2) Put Massachusetts under military rule.
  • There were Quartering Acts – requiring the colonists to house and feed British
    soldiers, even when they were send to enforce British laws upon them (besides
    the insult, it was an added expense to them).
  • Colonial legislatures were disbanded and colonial laws were suspended.
  • British troops raided, seized, and destroyed colonial property and attempted to arrest agitators, like Sam Adams and John Hancock.
  • Colonial leaders appealed to King George to intervene on their behalf, as English
    subjects, but he refused to help.  William Pitt addressed the House of Commons in England to explain the reason for the colonists’ “seditious spirit.”  He stated that in his opinion, Great Britain had no right to lay a tax on the colonies without their consent.  “The Americans,” he said, “are the subjects of this kingdom and equally entitled with yourselves to all the natural rights of mankind and the peculiar privileges of Englishmen – just as they are equally bound by its laws… The Americans are the sons not the bastards of England.”
  • Meanwhile, the first shots of revolution were fired in Boston, at Lexington Green on April 20, 1775 when Massachusetts militiamen stood face-to-face with British
    soldiers.
  • To further emphasize the injustices……… Thomas Paine published his Common
    Sense
    and Sam Adams published his pamphlet, “The Massachusetts Resolves,” and Patrick Henry was delivering fiery speeches urging “Give Me Liberty or Give Me Death!”  [Many in our lifetime can remember how stirring Martin Luther King Jr.'s "I Have a Dream" speech was.  So we can imagine the impact of Patrick Henry's speech].
  • Finally, on June 7, 1776 – Richard Henry Lee presented a formal resolution to the Second Continental Congress calling for a declaration of independence from Britain.  On June 11, the Committee was appointed.

A Detailed Timeline:

The French-Indian War ends (1761)  - In 1761, the British defeated the French in the French-Indian War.  (The French had posed a military threat to the northern American colonies). Parliament passed on the costs of that war to the colonists, and they thought it only fair.

The Sugar Act (1764) – increased the duties on imported sugar, textiles, coffee, wine

The Currency Act (1764) – prohibited the colonists from issuing any legal tender

The Quartering Act (1765) – required colonists to house and feed British soldiers

The Stamp Act (1765)  –  imposed the first direct tax on the American colonies
(directly to England).  Under the Stamp Act, all printed materials, including; newspapers, pamphlets, bills, legal documents, licenses, insurance policies, legal writs, almanacs, and even playing cards would have to carry a stamp showing that required taxes had been paid. The British appointed colonial businessmen to collect the taxes on behalf of England, but most refused to do the job out of fear of a growing opposition — mainly from the Sons of Liberty. (The Sons of Liberty formed in opposition to the Stamp Act. Groups emerged in all 13 colonies. The reason they formed was to force those who distributed the stamps and collected the tax to resign).  In New York City, violence broke out as a mob burned the royal governor in effigy.  All over the colonies, angry mobs shouted:  “Liberty, Property and NO STAMPS !”   It’s why the colonists began to protest “No Taxation without
Representation!”

Stamp Act Congress (1765)  - representatives from 9 colonies prepared a resolution to be sent to King George III and the English Parliament, listing the rights and grievances of the Colonies and demanding the Stamp Act be repealed.

Benjamin Franklin appeared before Parliament  – he warned of a likely revolution in the colonies if the Stamp Act was enforced by the British military.  Parliament then
rescinded the Stamp Act.

The Declaratory Act (1766)  - the same day the Stamp Act was repealed, Parliament adopted the Declaratory Act, which declared that Parliament had total power to legislate any laws governing the colonies in all cases whatsoever.

The Townshend Revenue Acts (1767) – imposed a tax on imports of such products as paper, tea, glass, lead and paints

Samuel Adams publishes his “Massachusetts Resolves” (1767) – Samuel Adams began to circulate a pamphlet titled the “Massachusetts Resolves,” calling for colonists to oppose protest against England’s “taxation without representation.”

The Boston Massacre (March 5, 1770) – After a mob harassed British soldiers in
Boston, the soldiers opened fire on them.  Ironically, it was the brilliant attorney, our own John Adams, who got the soldiers acquitted.

The Tea Act (1773) – imposed a heavy import tax on tea and allowed the India Tea Company to have a monopoly to supply the colonies.

The Boston Tea Party (Dec. 16, 1773)  - colonists disguised themselves as Mohawk Indians. boarded British ships in Boston harbor, and dumped all 342 containers of tea
into the harbor.

The Coercive Acts (aka, the Intolerable Acts (1774)  - (In retaliation for Boston Tea Party)   With these acts: (1)  All commercial shipping in Boston Harbor was stopped until Massachusetts paid the taxes owed on the tea dumped in the harbor and also reimbursed the East India Company for the loss of the tea; and  (2) Massachusetts was put under military rule. British General Thomas Gage, commander of all British military forces in the colonies, became the new Governor (thus ending colonial rule).

More Quartering Acts (1774)  - required colonists to shelter and feed more British soldiers. England sent more soldiers for the purpose of enforcing the Intolerable Acts.

Thomas Jefferson writes A Summary View of the Rights of British America (1774)  – in opposition to the Intolerable Acts.   It laid out a set of grievances against the
King for delegates to the First Continental Congress.

First Continental Congress Met in Philadelphia (September 5 -24, 1774) – All
colonies sent delegates except Georgia.  They declared the rights of colonists to Life, Liberty, and Property.

Edenton Tea Party (Oct. 25, 1775) – Ms. Penelope Barker organized an all-woman’s
protest against the Tea Act.  51 women signed a statement of protest vowing to give up tea and boycott other British products “until such time that all acts which tend to enslave our Native country shall be repealed.”

Patrick Henry delivered his famous speech to the Virginia legislature at St. John’s Church (March 23, 1775)  – (The Virginia legislature used to meet at St. John’s Church in Richmond.  Representatives at the time included: Thomas Jefferson, George Washington, Benjamin Harrison, Thomas Mann Randolph, Richard Bland, Richard Henry Lee and Francis Lightfoot Lee.)  The session on March 23 centered around a debate over the need to raise a militia to resist encroachments on civil rights by the British Government under King George III. Patrick Henry rose in support of a militia and in a passionate tone, said: “Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery?  I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!“  Two months later, on May 15, Lee would propose a resolution to
Virginia’s House of Burgesses (the first assembly of elected representatives in the American colonies) stating that “the delegates appointed to represent this colony in General Congress be instructed to propose to that respectable body to declare the united Colonies free and independent states.”

The American Revolution Began (April 20, 1775)  – On April 19, General Gage ordered 700 British soldiers to Concord to destroy the colonists’ weapons depot and then to capture rebel leaders, Sam Adams and John Hancock. That night, Paul Revere and William Dawes rode from Boston to warn colonists. Revere reached Lexington about
midnight and warned Adams and Hancock who were hiding out there.  “One if by land and two if by sea.”  By dawn the following day, about 70 armed Massachusetts militiamen stood face-to-face with the advancing British guard on Lexington Green. An unauthorized shot was fired – “the shot heard around the world” – and thus began the American Revolution.

John Adams would later write to Thomas Jefferson, “The Revolution was in the minds of the people fifteen (15) years before a drop of blood was shed at Lexington.”

Second Continental Congress Met in Philadelphia (May 10, 1775)  – It voted to appoint George Washington as Commander-in-Chief of the Continental Army

Thomas Paine’s Common Sense was published (Jan. 9, 1776)  - He wrote: “A government of our own is our natural right….. We have every opportunity and every encouragement before us, to form the noblest, purest constitution on the face of the earth.
We have it in our power to begin the world over again.”

William Pitt addressed the House of Commons in England (1776)  -  to explain the reason for the colonists’ “seditious spirit.”  He stated that in his opinion, Great Britain
had no right to lay a tax on the colonies without their consent.  “The Americans,” he said, “are the subjects of this kingdom and equally entitled with yourselves to all the natural rights of mankind and the peculiar privileges of Englishmen – just as they are equally bound by its laws… The Americans are the sons not the bastards of England.”

Halifax Reserves (March 12, 1776)  - North Carolina became the first state to make a formal recommendation that the states declare their independence from Great Britain

Resolution Presented for a Declaration of Independence (June 7, 1776)  - Richard Henry Lee presented a formal resolution to the Second Continental Congress calling for a declaration of independence from Britain. After introducing his resolution, Lee stood up and said: “Why delay?  Why still deliberate?  Let this happy day give birth to an American Republic. The eyes of Europe are fixed upon us: she demands of us a living example of freedom….  She invites us to prepare an asylum, where the unhappy may find solace, and the persecuted repose….”.

Committee Appointed to Draft Declaration (June 11, 17760 – Congress appointed a Committee to draft a Declaration of Independence.  Lee was appointed to prepare the draft.

IV.  THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE

Richard Henry Lee was appointed the task of drafting a Declaration, but his wife fell ill and he returned home to Virginia, leaving the task to Benjamin Franklin as the most senior and experienced statesman.  But pushing 70, he was not feeling well.  Next the task fell to John Adams, but Adams knew Thomas Jefferson was a much finer writer and so, as fate would have it, he was able to convince him to prepare the draft.

In preparing to write the Declaration of Independence, Jefferson looked to the Magna Carta and to the English Bill of Rights..  The Magna Carta, for inspiration on how to assert individual liberties, and the English Bill of Rights, for how to explain the reasons for separation from England.  And that, in good part, explains the Declaration….

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are
instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute a new Government…………  The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and
usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

(Jefferson then listed 27 grievances against King George)

I don’t think anyone has asserted individual liberties so magnificently and eloquently as Jefferson did.

[Note that the significant difference or improvement over the English documents is that our Founders announced that our fundamental rights are endowed by our Creator].

On July 4, the Congress formally endorsed Jefferson’s Declaration.  The actual signing of the Declaration of Independence occurred on August 2, when 56 members of Congress placed their names on the historic document. They signed this Declaration even though we were still at War with Britain and unlikely to win. They signed this document even though they knew that if the war for independence was not won, they could be tried for treason by England and executed.

The Declaration establishes the values on which our country was founded.  Together with the Constitution, these documents are our individual Charters of Freedom.  These are our Magna Carta, our Petition of Right, our English Bill of Rights. The great challenge for the delegates to the Convention of 1787 was to draft a Constitution that was able to put into
practice the values set forth in the Declaration.

(i)  The Declaration of Independence is the first national document in history acknowledging that fundamental rights are endowed upon man from a Creator.  America’s
independence was not only of worldwide significance because a new nation was founded in the New World, but because a new nation, the very first of its kind, was founded ‘under God.’

(ii)  “Under God” - Many make light of this phrase and its significance, and certainly
atheist groups hate it.  They are trying to remove it in every form possible and from every place they can.  It is not a statement of theology, but a statement of the ordering of rights and liberty.  This one sentence in the Declaration of Independence would become the very foundation of our Constitution and our system of government and the very basis of our rights and liberties.  It reflects our nation’s heritage.

V.  THE CONSTITUTION:  A MORE PERFECT UNION

The next step was to figure out a way to hold us together as a union (“a more perfect union”), keep us strong, and yet honor those reasons that the settlers came to America’s shores in the first place. And so, on May 25, 1787, 55 delegates from all of the states (except Connecticut), met in Philadelphia to draft a Constitution that would accomplish
these goals.

The Constitutional Convention (also known as the Philadelphia Convention) took place from May 25 to September 17, 1787.  Its purpose was to address problems in governing the United States under the Articles of Confederation. But certain leaders at the Convention (namely, James Madison and Alexander Hamilton) had other plans for the event: They wanted to start from scratch and create a new government that would be more effective.  Although not all the states were not unhappy with the Articles, after discussion began, they all came to agree that a new governing document was in the nation’s best interests. (that’s not to say that several elements of the Articles didn’t make it into the Constitution, but they did).

The states sent some of their finest minds to the Convention, including James Madison, Benjamin Franklin, George Washington, Alexander Hamilton, Gouverneur Morris, and George Mason. These are the men who designed our government and decided which powers it would have.

A few of our most important Founders were not present at the Convention. Thomas Jefferson, one of our most prolific and well-read Founders, was in France during the Convention, acting as Minister to that country.  John Adams was also abroad, as Minister to Great Britain. Patrick Henry refused to go because he “smelt a rat in Philadelphia.”  (referring most likely to Hamilton, who he suspected would try to push a system based on the British system).  And also absent were John Hancock and Samuel Adams.

At the Convention, there were 3 groups, each with a strong opinion as to the design and purpose of the government:

(i)  The first group was the Monarchists who wanted an all-powerful government modeled after the British system with no power remaining with the states.  Its only proponent was Alexander Hamilton.

(ii)  The second group was the Nationalists, who wanted a strong centralized “national” government and with little sharing of power with the states. Its most vocal proponent was James Madison. The Nationalist plan didn’t receive much support at the Convention.

(iii)  The third group was the Federalists, who luckily won the day at the Convention.  They wanted a federal government of limited powers and the states to retain their sovereign power.

[Note that there is a significant different between a "national" government and a "federal" government.  A "national" government is a central government of concentrated power.  Very little power is left to the states. A "federal" government is one of certain powers with the remainder left to the sovereign states. "Federal" refers to "federation."  A "federation of States" refers to a group of sovereign states. Federalism means the distribution of legislative authority between a central government having jurisdiction over national issues only and local governments having jurisdiction over regional issues].

Madison outlined a plan for a new government. In fact, he arrived at the Convention with a plan that hoped the other delegates would simply and quickly adopt.  Luckily that wasn’t the case. The overwhelming number of delegates weren’t willing to give up state sovereignty.  They understood that a strong central government could easily become tyrannical and they weren’t willing to trade one tyrant for another one.

How do we know this?  In The Federalist No. 39, James Madison acknowledged the Federalist position when he wrote: With respect  to “the extent of its powers…. the proposed government cannot be deemed a NATIONAL one since its jurisdiction extends to
certain enumerated objects only, and leaves to the several States” the remainder of power over all other objects which the government cannot intrude upon.

The issue on the mind of almost every representative at the Constitutional Convention was what kind of government was best for the new republic. The first plan was submitted by Edmund Randolph of the Virginia delegation. It was known as “The Virginia Plan.”  It was drafted by Madison and then tweaked in collaboration with other members of the Virginia delegation before the Convention began.  Under this plan:
(1)  The Articles of Confederation would be discarded
(2)  A new government of concentrated power would be set up in its place
(3)  The government would have broad powers
(4)  There would be 3 separate branches
(5)  Representation in Congress would be based on state population.

Under Virginia’s plan, the large states would benefit and carry a lot of influence.  As it was, under the Articles, each state was represented equally, which made the smaller states happy.

William Paterson, of NJ, countered with the “New Jersey Plan.”  Under this plan:
(1)  The Articles of Confederation would be kept, but a new power would be granted to Congress -
the power to levy and collect taxes
(2)  The government would have limited and defined powers
(3)  Equal representation in Congress for all states

The delegates agreed to travel to Philadelphia because most understood that the government under the Articles was ineffective.  It lacked enforcement power above all else.  The delegates wanted a government with more power but not one with too much power. They felt the People would be best served if power remained with the states, where it was closest to them.

After much deliberation, the delegates reached a compromise (“The Great Compromise”) led in great part by Roger Sherman of Connecticut and to some degree by Ben Franklin.  The Compromise was:

(1)  2 houses of Congress (representation in the lower house based on population, and equal representation in the upper house)
(2)  Government of limited and defined powers
(3)  States remain sovereigns
(4)  Separation of powers, where each branch checks the power of the others

Although it was discussed, none of the delegates thought a Bill of Rights was necessary.

The delegates left the Convention in September and returned home, knowing the real task was still ahead of them – selling their document to the individual states for ratification.  Article VII of the Constitution read: “The ratification by nine states is sufficient to establish this Constitution.”

Within 10 days after Convention wrapped up, a letter was printed in the New York Journal urging the people of that state to reject the new compact. Nevertheless, 3 states quickly voted to adopt the Constitution.  Then 2 more states joined in.  Massachusetts was torn, but after it was given assurances that a Bill of Rights would be added, it eventually adopted.  On June 21, 1788 – 9 months after the Convention – the magical number of nine states was reached and the Constitution was established.

New York and Virginia, 2 key states because of their size and power, still thought the Constitution concentrated too much power in a federal government and it was most likely that they would not ratify.   And it was highly doubtful that the new Constitution or the new Union would survive without the approval of these states –  because if a state didn’t ratify the Constitution, then it didn’t join the Union. So the battle for the Constitution went into high gear. NY and Virginia threatened to destroy the whole plan that had begun at the Constitutional Convention.

During the state ratification process, the Anti-Federalist Papers and then The Federalist Papers played a crucial role.

Those who supported the Constitution took the name “Federalists” and those who were leery of it and thought it concentrated too much power in a central government called themselves the “Anti-Federalists.”  First, the accusations and attacks came from the Anti-Federalists. They published their criticisms, in essay form, under such names as Cato, Brutus, and The Federal Farmer.  It is believed that Richard Henry Lee, who presented the formal resolution to the Congress calling for a Declaration of Independence, wrote the Federal Farmer essays, NY Governor George Clinton wrote the Cato essays, and Robert Yates, a NY judge and friend of Clinton, wrote the Brutus essays.  [By the way, the concept of Nullification that we hear about, and which author Thomas Woods promotes, comes from the Federal Farmer].  Patrick Henry was another vocal anti-Federalist. The authors of The Federalist Papers were Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay.  Notice the significance of these authors: Alexander Hamilton was from the hold-out state of New York, and James Madison from the hold-out state of Virginia. The Federalist Papers were a series of essays (85 in total) which explain in detail what each section means and what the intent behind it is.

To this day, The Federalist Papers are viewed as the ultimate authority on the intent and interpretation of the Constitution. They were absolutely instrumental in selling the Constitution to the states.  Sadly, the Supreme Court over the years has rarely referred to them in interpreting the Constitution.

The future of the Constitution and in fact, the future of the Union, ultimately came down to a Bill of Rights.

The States thought the government under the Constitution could have a tendency to become too powerful, and therefore they demanded a Bill of Rights. They wanted to make sure the federal government would respect the rights “endowed by the Creator.”  It was not until assurances were given that would be added that the states eventually ratified.

In a letter dated December 20, 1787 to Madison, only months after the Convention ended, Thomas Jefferson called the omission of a Bill of Rights a major mistake.  He wrote: “A Bill of Rights is what the people are entitled to against every government, and what no just government should refuse.”  Madison was eventually convinced.  By 1788, both Jefferson and Madison would argue that a declaration of rights was necessary to establish the government, and especially the judiciary, as “guardians” of  individual rights.  In fact, Madison ran for a seat in the first US Congress that year on a platform to include a  Bill of Rights. That’s when Virginia and then New York finally ratified.  (A bit of trivia:  North Carolina would ratify a year later, being one of the last states to join the Union. Rhode Island was the last).

The Constitution went into effect on March 3, 1789 and the first Congress met shortly thereafter. George Washington was elected our first President on April 30. And on June 8, 1789, Madison presented his draft of a Bill of Rights, which included a list of 12.   After some debate and revision, they were sent to the states for ratification and 10 were adopted. The Bill of Rights, as the first 10 amendments to the Constitution, was officially ratified by the states on Dec. 15, 1791.

We all know what is written in the Constitution.  Originally written, it fit 4 printed pages.  Add the Bill of Rights, and it is 5 pages.

  • It lists the specific powers granted to each separate branch of government.  It sets limits on their power by delegating only specific responsibilities.  For example, Article I lists only 17 powers – plus the “Necessary & Proper” clause – for the Congress.
  • It sets forth how to amend the Constitution, if the people are so inclined.   (Article V).
  • It declares that the US Constitution is the supreme law of the land.   (Article VI)
  • It lists those rights that our Founders considered so fundamental to our humanity and so important with respect to government that the government must protect them (the Bill of Rights)…  just as the Magna Carta, Petition of Right, and English Bill of Rights had laid out in England.  [NOTE that The Bill of Rights does NOT grant any individual liberties. It simply lists those rights that government must protect.

The Constitution is the foundation of our nation. It is the great guarantee of liberty. Again, together with the Declaration, they constitute the charter of our freedom.  It is OUR document.   It is our document to limit government and NOT the government’s document to try to regulate US.

The Convention of 1787 produced the most enduring written Constitution ever created by human hands and human minds. In fact, the United States Constitution is the oldest written constitution still in use by any nation in the world.

The bedrock principle on which our country was founded is INDIVIDUAL LIBERTY.  Our founding ideal is Individual Liberty.  To that end, there are four simple principles on which our nation was founded (and these are clearly laid out in the Declaration of Independence):

(1)  There is a Creator;
(2)  We derive our basic human rights from our Creator;
(3)  The role of the government is to protect these rights we derive from our Creator; and
(4)  All other power that the government has comes from the consent of the governed (the people).

The Declaration of Independence is the value system on which our Constitution was based.

VI.  OUR FOUNDING PRINCIPLES (a detailed look)

When you think of the United States, you think of Liberty. Americans enjoy a great deal of personal liberty.  People around the world know we enjoy fundamental human rights, we believe all men are created equal, we have equal rights, and we have a Constitution that vigorously protects all these.  I think it’s important for every person who values individual liberty to understand how our Founders secured those liberties for us.

There are many principles which form the foundation of the Constitution its design of
government.  All of these principles have one goal in common — to promote individual liberty).

1ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF A CREATOR.  As a nation, we believe in and acknowledge a Creator.  Our rights are linked to a Creator and not to a benevolent government.

Our nation is built on the right of the individual to worship freely or not; to believe in God or not.  (We have freedom of religion, and not freedom from religion).  But nevertheless, it is clear that our nation was founded on religious identity and principles.  Our Founders understood there is a God.  By acknowledging God and His role in the universe, our Founders were able to ground individual human liberties in the human connection or our Divine connection to Him, and in that way secure them from the reaches of government.  Try reading the Declaration of Independence without the references to God (Creator):

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed….

To read the Declaration without the reference to God would be to acknowledge that individual rights have no legal foundation.  “Endowed with certain unalienable rights….”
Endowed how?  What is the foundation?  If it is merely that they are endowed by circumstance of their birth, then the nexus is extremely weak.  Birth implies location and
jurisdiction. Jurisdiction explains where the state has power over the individual.  If individuals are simply “endowed with certain unalienable rights,” the government can easily step in and say something like this: “Since you are born in the United States, the US government will dictate what rights you have.”  If individual rights come from the state, then the state can regulate them or take them away.  Our Founders understood this.  They studied the oppressive regimes of history.

Thomas Jefferson wrote:  “God who gave us life gave us liberty.  And can the liberties of a
nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are of the Gift of God?…..”

2.  NATURAL LAW  (from Marcus Tullius Cicero)

Our Founders believed that certain human liberties are so fundamental to one’s existence, humanity, and individuality that they must come from our Creator.  If that is the case, then no government can take them away. Natural law is also the basis of individual sovereignty.  Natural law (and individual sovereignty) form the foundation for the Bill of Rights.

Natural law is what spontaneously arises when there is no government, because of “who we are” and who created us.

Natural law derives from the nature of man and the world, just as physical law derives from the nature of space, time, and matter.

“Natural Law” is the political philosophy proposed by Marcus Tullius Cicero of ancient Rome and embraced by later (English) philosophers such as John Locke, Sir William
Blackstone, and Thomas Hooker, and even of Jesus himself.  Cicero came to be enlightened one day while he was walking and trying to imagine what an ideal Rome would be like.  As the foremost lawyer of his day, he was concerned with law.  He wondered where laws came from. He came to conclude that law, that which distinguishes good from bad and which encourages the former and discourages and punishes the latter,
did not originate from man alone.  That is, law was not a matter of written statutes but was a matter deeply and fundamentally ingrained in the human spirit.  Cicero’s reasoned as follows:

1).  There is an order to the universe:  There is a Creator who created the universe then created people. People, in turn, form into communities, and in order to keep their communities ordered, they establish local governments.  Finally, local governments give rise to central governments.   [It's like: What came first.. the chicken or the egg?]  Natural law is what spontaneously arises when there is no government, because of “who we are” and who created us.

2).  Humans, like the Earth and the universe itself, were created by a higher power (a Creator; a God)

3).  This higher power which created the universe also endowed humans with a bit of its own divinity (We are Created in His Image;  that is, He gave us the powers of speech, intelligent thought, reason, and wisdom.  We love and nurture our young; We build life-long family units).

4).  As a result of this “spark of divinity,” humans are and should be (forever) linked to their Creator and should honor this relationship.

5). Because humans share reason with this higher power, and because this higher power is presumed to be benevolent, it follows that humans, when employing reason correctly, will also be benevolent.

6).  Reason and benevolence (termed “right reason”) is therefore the foundation of law. When this is applied in a society, it is JUSTICE.

Natural Law is timeless;  It is valid for all nations for all times.  (See Cleon Skousen’s The 5000-Year Leap)

It operates best when men are virtuous and honorable.  It fails when men are greedy and depraved.

3.  INDIVIDUAL LIBERTY    (our founders learned this from over 1000 years of English history)

This is the reason that our Founders took such care to find the best political philosophies to base our Constitution on — to protect individual liberty.  That’s what it all was about…. the right to be independent of the will of another and especially to exercise freely those
inalienable rights endowed by our Creator without government interference.

Daniel Webster explained:  “Liberty exists in proportion to wholesome restraint.”  This is not to saw that liberty is something that needs to be controlled or restrained (especially by government).  Webster understood that while God gave us our liberty, he set limitations on our conduct (set out in the Bible).  So “wholesome restraint” is that which comes through religion, morality and ethics.

4.  INDIVIDUAL SOVEREIGNTY –  (from John Locke)

Certain fundamental rights are inherent in man.  As our Founders reasoned: ‘How can we give consent to others – local government, state government, etc – to make rules for us if we don’t have the original power to make rules for ourselves?”

It was the sovereign people (“We the People”) who created the United States under the
Constitution.  There is a reason the Constitution is written on behalf of us….  Because the power is derived from us.

5.  STATE SOVEREIGNTY –

State sovereignty is the supreme and absolute power vested in an independent state to regulate its internal affairs without foreign interference.

Strong states are best to protect the rights and address the concerns of the People, especially by checking the power of the government.

6.  THE PRIMARY ROLE OF GOVERNMENT  (John Locke)

The primary role of government is to protect the sovereign rights of the People.  Our Founders took this concept from John Locke.

John Locke took the Cicero’s concept of Natural Law one step further and applied it to government.  According to Locke, people (not rulers or governments) are sovereign.  Individuals have sovereign rights which no government can take away.  As such, government is morally obliged to serve people, namely by protecting life, liberty, and property.  He explained that natural law tradition could be observed with the ancient Jews and in fact, the design and purpose of government was influenced by the ancient Israelites.

John Locke said: “The end of law is not to abolish or restrain, but to preserve and enlarge freedom.  For in all the states of created beings, capable of laws, where there is no law
there is no freedom. For liberty is to be free from restraint and violence from others…”   –  John Locke

Unfortunately, when laws become too numerous and detailed, they can destroy liberty just as surely and effectively as having no law.

7.  FEDERALISM -

Federalism is a sharing of power.  Our Founders assigned specific powers to the “federal” government and left all remaining powers with the states. That is why it is called a “federal government,” as opposed to a “national” government.  This sharing of power is memorialized in the 10th Amendment.  Its purpose is to protect individual liberty by controlling the bounds of government.  It’s a very important part of our system of “check and balances” on government power.

In The Federalist No. 45, James Madison explained this division of power to those who viewed the newly-drafted Constitution with skepticism:

“The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government are few and defined.  Those which are to remain in the state governments are numerous and indefinite. The powers reserved to the several states will extend to all the objects which, in the ordinary course of affairs, concern the lives, liberties, and property of the people, and the internal order, improvement, and prosperity of the state.”

According to Madison, the idea was to keep the power base close to the people.  The emphasis was on strong local self-government.  The states would be responsible for internal affairs and the federal government would confine itself to those areas which could not be fairly or effectively handled by the states (such as raising an army, providing a Navy, regulating Commerce among nations and among the several states, raising revenue,
regulating money, and establishing rules for Naturalization and Immigration)

Power closest to the people is most responsive to the people.

8.  RULE of LAW -

REPUBLIC vs. DEMOCRACY –

1.  Our nation was intentionally set up as a republic rather than a true democracy.  It is a Constitutional republic because the Constitution is the Supreme Law of the land.

2.   It is a nation of laws and not a nation of men.

3.  A pure democracy is the Rule of Men.  It is mob rule.  In a democracy, any group of individuals composing any minority group has no protection against the unlimited power of the majority.

4.  With a republican form of government, on the other hand, there is a degree of insulation between the people (who might try to rule in a frenzied mob style and deny rights to minority groups) and government rule.  The purpose is to control rule-making… to make sure it’s done in a calm, deliberate, and thoughtful manner.

5.  Its purpose is to protect EVERY individual’s God-given, unalienable rights.

6.  Our particular republican form of government is based on a separation of power because our Founders understood the inherent weakness and depravity of man and the tendency for power. This was the argument Madison made in The Federalist No. 55.

9.  LIMITED GOVERNMENT  –  (Again the Founders relied on John Locke, and thousands of years of history).

The powers of the government are limited and clearly defined.  The states ratified the Constitution in reliance on the promise to respect state sovereignty and to form a government of limited and defined powers. in order to the keep the states in control and to keep power closest to the people.

To Madison, the Constitution was written as a social compact in which “We the People” granted specific, limited powers to the federal government.

The Federalist Papers (which addressed the criticisms of the newly-drafted Constitution) are full of assurances that the federal government is one of limited and clearly-defined
powers.  The state ratifying conventions are also another great resource.

Only a limited government can effectively secure individual liberty.

“To take a single step beyond the boundaries drawn around the powers of Congress, is to take possession of a boundless field of power, no longer susceptible of any definition.”    –  Thomas Jefferson.

Jefferson instructed us that the Constitution should always be construed in favor of a limited government.

10.  SEPARATION of POWERS  (providing a System of Checks and Balances).

The powers of the government were to remain limited and defined through a
branched form of government and through a series of checks and balances.

1).  The Separation of Powers doctrine was inspired by Montesquieu and John Locke.

2).  It calls for a division of authority among different branches of government. One branch (the legislative) makes laws.  A second branch (the executive) carries out the laws, and a third branch (the judicial) interprets the laws.

3).  Each branch has a discrete and defined area of power and there is a clear separation of functions between them.

4).  The separation of powers is a constitutional principle designed to prevent the accumulation of excessive power in any one branch.

5).  Because the branches are separate, they act to check each other when one tries to assume power that doesn’t belong to it.  It reduces the risk of tyranny and abuse from the government as a whole.

6).  Separation of Powers ensures that each branch operates within Constitutional limits and doesn’t become destructive of Constitutional aims and destructive of individual liberty.

Types of Checks and Balances:
–  Between the branches of government
–  State v. Federal
–  People v. Government  (people must be informed and engaged)

Federalist No. 51, written by James Madison, says: “In framing a government which is to be administered by men over men, the great difficulty lies in this:  You must first enable the government to control the governed;  and in the next place oblige it to control itself.”

11.  FREE MARKETS -

1).  The Founders embraced the economic philosophy put forth by Adam Smith (in his book Wealth of Nations published in 1776) which is the capitalism system we have today.

2).  It is a philosophy that essentially keeps government out of the market system and explains government protection of patents and useful arts.

3).  Smith wrote that the most efficient economic system is driven by supply and demand and by pure competition.

4).  It is also driven by self-interest and rightful rewards.

5).  Smith believed that the “free market” system would work most effectively in the absence of government interference.

6).  He wrote that individuals acting in their own self-interest would naturally seek out economic activities that provided the greatest financial rewards. Smith was convinced that this self-interest would in turn maximize the economic well-being of society as a whole.

7).  Finally, he argued that true wealth of a nation did not lay in gold but rather in the productive capacity of all people, who are properly motivated (rewards risk-taking and investment) and who work hard, each seeking to benefit from his or her own labors.

12.  THE RIGHT to ABOLISH GOVERNMENT

The Declaration reads:  “That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government…..”

Our founders were inspired by John Locke.  In his Second Treatise on Government, John Locke discussed the right of the people to revolt against governments which exceed their power and become overbearing.  He wrote:  “The people are absolved from obedience when illegal attempts are made upon their liberties or properties because self-defense is a part of the law of Nature.“

VI.  CONCLUSION

We often wonder if the Constitution is still capable of protecting individual liberty, as all three branches, especially the Courts have eroded it quite a bit over the years.  What will become of this great American “experiment” which was started by our Founding Fathers?   When I think of this, I think of the significance of Washington’s chair at the Convention:

When the delegates to the Constitutional Convention met in that small, hot, stuffy room at the Pennsylvania State House in Philadelphia (now known as “Independence Hall”), there was a chair that George Washington, as the president of the Convention, sat in which had a carving of the sun and its rays centered at its top. Benjamin Franklin would often remark to Madison during the Convention that he wondered if the carving signified a sunrise or sunset for the new country.  According to James Madison, Franklin finally figured it out.  He told Madison: “Now at length I have the happiness to know that it is a rising and not a setting Sun.”

We would hope that’s still true.

The hope is that Americans will always remember what it means to be uniquely American and appreciate all that was given by those men given the task of securing the very
ideal on which our nation was founded – Individual Liberty.  As long as we grateful for these liberties, understand how they are firmly protected (education), and are willing to defend them against a growing government, then we can enjoy the sunrise.

About forloveofgodandcountry

I'm originally from New Jersey where I spent most of my life. I now live in North Carolina with my husband and 4 children. I'm an attorney
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to US History 101: Our Founding History

  1. I have read so many content regarding the blogger lovers but this piece of writing is in fact a nice article, keep it
    up.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s